Wednesday, July 13, 2011

UNTUNGNYA ANWAR

UNTUNGNYA menjadi Anwar.

Boleh tangguh-tangguhkan kes berkali-kali. Boleh mempunyai senarai peguam yang ramai. Hebat-hebat pulak tu. Seperti tiada yang berani 'sentuhi'nya.

Buat laporan palsu kononnya bukan dia dalam video dengan amoi, tidak didakwa.

Dakwaan meliwat Saiful, tidak dikenakan tahanan. Boleh bergerak ke mana-mana. Hatta, boleh ke luar negara. Pasport tidak ditahan.

Bayangkan, jika seorang orang kampung didakwa meliwat (bukanpun meliwat lagi, dan tak ada sejarah peliwatan), akan dimasukkan dalam lokap, dan tidak diberikan bebas ataqs jaminan. Merengkoklah orang kampung itu dalam penjara.

Anwar untung.

Jika orang lain, apa lagi orang berbaju UMNO yang sudah jelas bukti DNA dan video tulen, dah lama orang ramai mencemuh. Orang ramai tak percayainya lagi. Sebaliknya, Anwar memang anugerah.

Walaupun ada sejarah peliwatan terhadap Azizan, pemandu isterinya dan disahkan oleh ketiga-tiga hakim dalam Mahkamah Persekutuan, dan kini sekali lagi, orang ramai masih tidak percayai Anwar buat.

"Mustahil Anwar buat....beliau dah berusia 64 tahun,' kata orang ramai.

Anwar boleh buat apa sahaja yang ia sukai - mencuri dan orang ramai tak akan mempercayai dia mencuri; merompak - orang tak akan mempercayai dia akan tergamak melakukan perbuatan itu, meliwat dan berzina sesuka hati - orang tak akan mempercayainya.





MAKLUMAT NEGARA BOCOR

(Sumber: Malaysia-today)

YB Datuk,

Attached please find the guidance/messaging on the Bersih issue for your attention and action, where necessary.
This follows the UMNO Political Bureau meeting where this issue was also discussed and that this material be circulated to all bureau members.
Please note that the usual confidentiality rule applies.
Please do not forward or disseminate it to unauthorised person/persons.
Thank you and best regards
Jalil Hamid
Head, National Communications Team, PMO
*************************************
GUIDANCE ON KEY ISSUES No 8/2011
Issue: BERSIH 2.0

By most accounts, the Bersih 2.0 protest on July 9 could turn out to be massive and will certainly go beyond issues of fair and free elections. With over 100 political, NGO and right groups could be joining the “March for Democracy”, we expect them to champion a slew of issues ranging from inflation to Teoh Beng Hock and Lynas. The protest, if not countered, could undermine the government, the economy and national security. This note sets out the policy guidance and the do’s and don’ts in managing the issue.

Advisory

The process of mind-conditioning will continue in the run-up to July 9. The process will include:
1. Discredit the organisation and its key leaders. Bersih is neither registered with ROS nor ROC. It is NOT an election watchdog but a group of politicians and politically inclined individuals who lack credibility.
2. Label the rally as “perhimpunan haram” or “illegal assembly”, and that the people behind Bersih are trouble shooters and going against the Constitution and the law to gain political mileage.
3. That they are just a front for the opposition.
4. Since DSAI is already “out of the race” for premiership, he has to resort to street protests because PR can’t win GE13 through ballot boxes. He is seeking a “short-cut” to Putrajaya via undemocratic and unconstitutional means. Remind people about his Sept 16 bluff.
5. DSAI is also using this to shift the public attention away from his legal and moral woes.
6. Create anxiety that Bersih is working for the interests of foreign elements, who are out to destabilise the country.
7. That BERSIH is not bersih (clean) after all as it is an illegal group out to create havoc.

Do’s and Don’ts

1. KDN Minister, IGP, DIG and Internal Security and Public Order Director to brief media editors at KDN. Use the meeting to reinforce the branding as “perhimpunan haram”, that Bersih is an unlawful organisation and the perpetrators are out to create chaos.
2. KDN, which has jurisdiction over all print media, needs to exert its authority in ensuring the press toe the line.
3. Confine politicians to just making political statements. Let the police do their job.
4. PDRM can start calling up Bersih organisers based on the hundreds of police reports lodged so far.
5. Encourage the use of 3rd party validators.
6. Pre-empt chaos and disorder (fear paradigm). The “show of force” by UMNO or silat groups well before July 9 may be imperative to deter demonstrators.
7. The soundbytes in our favour MUST come from across the country and across the ethnic lines. The soundbytes should not just be confined to the Malays or those residing in the Klang Valley.
8. We must not allow the rally to be exploited by international elements.
9. As a pre-emptive measure, the authorities should stop the launch of Perhimpunan Bersih 2.0 scheduled for 19 June at the Chinese Assembly Hall. Likewise, a related Perkasa event called “Lawan Perhimpunan Bersih” at the Sultan Sulaiman Club on the same day should also be halted.
10. SPR should counter Bersih demands for free and fair elections by highlighting the various initiatives it has undertaken so far. Use the highly successful Sarawak PRN as its model. It should not meet up with Bersih people.

Recommended media treatment

1. Media to highlight stories of how businesses, retailers, tourists, shoppers, motorists and ordinary people will be affected. (July is the peak month for Arab tourist arrivals; plus the top three EPL teams will also be in town in July). Malaysia will be in bad light if the teams skip KL on security grounds.
2. Question the source of funding for Bersih.
3. The media will primarily be targeting the trio: DSAI (who is capitalising on this ahead of his July 15 Sodomy 2 trial), the newly minted PAS deputy chief Mat Sabu (who is the budak suruhan DSAI and tali barut DAP) and Ambiga.
4. We will encourage the media to use file photos of Ambiga with PR leaders to highlight her close association with them. Ambiga has the history of leading street protests when she was Bar Council president.
5. The media to use less of the same old faces (eg Zul Nordin, Zahrain, Ibrahim Ali) as “attack dogs.” Try to tap fresh faces (eg BN Youth leaders, some NGOs).
6. Friendly bloggers and cybertroopers will continue to be mobilised.
7. TV stations to constantly play up images of ugly demos in other countries.

Desired outcome

1. Neutralise the opposition noise.
2. Reinforce the view that public sentiment is NOT with Bersih and the opposition.
3. Send a strong message that the government is full control of the situation, that it will not tolerate trouble makers and those who undermine the rule of law.
4. No apparent adverse impact on investor confidence or Malaysia’s political risks.

17 June 2011

PROGRAM 'SENTUHAN HATI"

KEBETULAN sesungut ada membicarakan akan pemberian budi, untuk melawan propaganda pembangkang, TPM Muhyiddin juga bercakap perkara hampir sama di Ledang, semalam agar program UMNO/BN mestilah ada unsur 'sentuhan hati'.

Muhyiddin mencadangkan program berbentuk 'turun padang'.

Sesungut ingin membawa cadangan lain iaitu kelas-kelas tuisyen kepada anak-anak di kampung, pinggir bandar dan bandar. Dengan cara ini, ibu bapa akan merasai sentuhan berkenaan, apa lagi apabila berlaku peningkatan pencapaian peperiksaan anak-anak mereka.

Methodologinya melalui penubuhan jawatankuasa berbentuk pendidikan. Misalnya, Kelab Pendidikan Kedah. Elok juga jika tidak terlalu nampak UMNO. Tapi, jika menggunakan baju UMNO sepenuhnya tidak mengapa, kerana tujuannya untuk memberi khidmat pendidikan.

Elok diberhentikan kaedah lama seperti mengutamakan hal-hal kompang, berbanding dengan pendidikan itu sendiri.

Kursus-kursus bahasa Inggeris diperhebatkan.

Cari juga kaedah agar peluang pekerjaan, sambung belajar diberikan kepada mereka....

Inilah 'gerakan'.....

UMNO sudah hampir mati 'gerakan' ....dulu, 'gerakan seperti ini digerakkan oleh GPMS.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

PERANG POLITIK vs BUDI

SEMALAM, guru berkata, undi tidak menang dengan hujah. Betapa baiknya hujah tidak semestinya akan mengubah seseorang itu. Menang hujah logik dan akal tidak semestinya mengubah pendirian seseorang.

Yang sokong Bersih akan terus sokong. Yang beriklinasi kerajaan akan menolak Bersih. Kedua-dua ada hujah. Masing-masing menggunakan kepintaran. Jika kumpulan proBersih menggunakan Perkara 10 (1) Perlembagaan Persekutuan yang memberi kebebasan kepada rakyat untyuk berhimpin secara aman, kumpulan prokerajaan menggunakan Perkara 10 (2) Perlembagaan yang menyatakan perhimpunan juga mesti ada batas-batasnya.

Guru juga berkata, rata-rata rakyat ada kecenderungan untuk antiestablishment. Jelas terpancar dalam Generasi Y. Anak-anak muda tidak mahu dikongkong. Anak-anak muda mahu bebas pemikiran. Anak-anak muda mahukan pendirian sendiri.

Menariknya, kecederungan itu dimanfaatkan oleh pembangkang, dipropagandakan, disuap, dan diindoktrinasi semahu-mahunya.

Tidak ramai yang mampu mempunyai fikiran sendiri dan dalam masa sama tidak menyokong pembangkang.

Jika begitu, guru, apakah tiada jalan penyelesaian?

"Budi," Budi mesti diberikan, bukan hujah. Budi tidak semestinya duit. Budi ialah sesuatu yang bermakna dan memberi kesan mendalam kepada kemanusiaan seseorang.

UMNO telah bertapak lama. UMNO pernah suatu ketika dilihat, dirasai dan diyakini memberi 'budi' kepada seluruh orang Melayu. Tun Razak begitu jelas akan hal ini. Tun Razak begitu menonjol akan perkara ini dan Tun Razak telah memberikan contoh yang amat baik.

Puteri UMNO suatu ketika, zaman Kak Aza, telah muncul dan kelihatan memberi budi yang luar biasa kepada rakyat. Sentuhannya dirasai. Buat kerja-kerja kebajikan. Buat tuisyen merata-rata. Buat English-on-wheels. Kesannya tidak sedikit. Keputusan anak-anak orang kampung dalam UPSR meningkat. Ibu bapa suka hati.

Roh ini semakin sirna. Semakin hilang dalam 'rasaan' rakyat. Ibu bapa kurang lagi merasai sentuhan berkenaan.

Pemuda dah begitu 'tua'. Sentiasa sibuk mencari sen. Hormat masyarakat bukan terhadap seseorang yang begitu cepat dapat mengumpul kekayaan. Hormat masyarakat bukan terhadap hujah intelektual seseorang.

Masyarakat akan 'tunduk' apabila budi ikhlas memasuki ruang perasaannya.